<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Turning ClearType off, even when you already have it off</title>
	<link>http://blog.hanfordlemoore.com/2007/02/23/turning-cleartype-off-even-when-you-already-have-it-off</link>
	<description>User Interface , Art, Design, Games</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Turning ClearType off, even when you already have it off by: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://blog.hanfordlemoore.com/2007/02/23/turning-cleartype-off-even-when-you-already-have-it-off#comment-105853</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 12:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.hanfordlemoore.com/2007/02/23/turning-cleartype-off-even-when-you-already-have-it-off#comment-105853</guid>
					<description>Clear type is a nightmare simply because once again Microsoft believes it knows best for the masses by having it turned on by default in both OS and IE. From a design perspective it's just awful at rendering 10px/pt fonts. At that size or lower, there is no room for their so-called color fringing and thus your text appears a different color than intended. Again, what's with the defaults?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Clear type is a nightmare simply because once again Microsoft believes it knows best for the masses by having it turned on by default in both OS and IE. From a design perspective it&#8217;s just awful at rendering 10px/pt fonts. At that size or lower, there is no room for their so-called color fringing and thus your text appears a different color than intended. Again, what&#8217;s with the defaults?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
